Dated record

Timeline

Dates are only useful when their uncertainty is visible. The birth year is recorded as contested; the company, demonstrations, death, and expose are stronger anchors.

1827 / 1837

Birth year is contested

The concept brief requests 1827, and some memorial and older sympathetic sources use 1827. Gale, Wikimedia/Wikidata-derived summaries, and the New York Times obituary tradition support 1837 or imply it by age. This site flags the conflict instead of silently choosing a false certainty.

1872

Early hydro-vacuo / hydro-pneumatic claim

MacDougall connects Keely's early motor language to an unsuccessful patent application and to the family of names later attached to the machines: Hydro-Vacuo Engine, Hydro-Pneumatic Pulsating Vacuo-Engine, and related labels.

1874

Keely Motor Company incorporated

Gale gives April 29, 1874 as the incorporation date. The company existed to promote and commercialize Keely's claimed force, but the practical motor remained always near completion and never became a marketable engine.

1874-1875

Early demonstrations become newspaper news

Reports of water, air, pressure, and a new vaporic or etheric power brought the motor into public view. Keely's explanations remained incomplete, and patent protection was repeatedly invoked as a reason not to disclose the mechanism.

Late 1870s

Stock speculation and rising expectations

MacDougall reports that shares rose from $50 to $150 by 1879, with some later sales reported at higher prices. The stock story shows how the machine generated financial work even without producing industrial work.

1881-1882

Stockholders seek the secret

Managers and stockholders pushed Keely to disclose enough of the principle that the company could protect its investment. Secrecy, once useful in promotion, became a corporate risk.

1888

Court pressure and imprisonment episode

Legal disputes over inspection and disclosure placed Keely under direct pressure. Supporter accounts describe him destroying or rebuilding delicate instruments in this period, including the claimed vibratory microscope.

1889-1890

Supporter visits and sympathetic framing

Moore and allied witnesses continued to interpret Keely's work as a sensitive research program rather than a failed machine. Their accounts are primary sources for the belief system, not independent proof of a working motor.

1893

Keely and His Discoveries published

Clara Bloomfield Moore published the most important supporter-side book. It framed Keely's researches as part of a larger sympathetic-vibratory physics and remains essential for understanding the believer case.

Nov. 18, 1898

Keely dies in Philadelphia

Keely died before producing a disclosed, commercial motor. His death moved the evidence question from future promise to posthumous inspection: was there a secret that could be operated without him?

Jan. 1899

Laboratory expose

The Philadelphia Press investigation, summarized by the New York Times and amplified by illustrated newspaper coverage, reported hidden tubes, concealed spaces, water-motor connections, and a large sphere associated with ordinary power.

1899 onward

Afterlife of the Keely Motor

The motor survived as a cautionary tale, a believer tradition, and a history of technology case study. The best current archive posture is to preserve both sides of the record while treating the hidden-apparatus explanation as the strongest evidence-based conclusion.

Sources used on this page